PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD & NEGLIGENCE
USC Oncologist and Psychiatric Nurse
Charged With Misrepresenting Facts, With Circumventing the Law and With
Endangering Cancer Patient’s Welfare.
They are also charged with failing to warn
a 73-year-old male patient of malignant side effects of a newly marketed drug
they had prescribed to the patient and by failing to inform the patient that
the drug they were prescribing is listed as an anti-psychotic drug.
It is a documented fact that
antipsychotic drugs do not prevent psychotic thinking. According to leading
neuroscientists, such drugs in fact induce psychotic thinking, severely impair
one’s psychomotor reflexes, to include one’s ability to defend one’s self and
to make intelligent decisions. They also significantly impair a patient’s
vision and weaken a patient’s immune system, thereby placing the patient at
risk for developing a variety of forms of cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Melissa Frost, a Glendora, California
psychiatric nurse practitioner, who has incorporated herself, prescribed and
distributed professional samples of a new and questionable antipsychotic
drug, Latuda,
the brand name for lurasidone, manufactured by Dainippon Sumitoma Pharma in
Osaka, Japan, without informing the patient why she was prescribing such a drug
and of the potentially dangerous and malignant side effects of the drug.
According to Frost, Dr. Cynthia Martel, a
Pasadena oncologist affiliated with a University of Southern California medical
group known as Norris Oncology Center, referred the 73-year-old cancer patient
to nurse Melissa Frost in November of 2011, claiming the 73-year-old patient is
having “difficulty concentrating.”
However, it is the patient’s belief
that it is Dr. Cynthia Martel and her colleagues who are having difficulty in
concentrating and in appropriately addressing the patient’s concerns about
their diagnostic and proposed treatment methods.
“The arrogance of Dr. Martel and nurse
Frost,” says the 73-year-old male patient, “is exceeded only by their ignorance
– by their inability to understand the relationship between brain chemistry and
human emotions and the fact that so-called antipsychotic drugs and
antidepressant drugs are more of a nemesis than an aid in restoring feelings of
well being. Most cancers are primarily triggered by severe ongoing
emotional distress, according to the experts, to include strong feelings of
abandonment by one’s family and community.”
The 73-year-old patient is a trained
and experienced analyst, counselor and public speaker. He is also the author of
over 20 publications dealing with a variety of issues in medical jurisprudence,
particularly in regard to psychiatric diagnosis and treatment.
It is the patient’s belief that
psychiatry, as it is currently practiced is a fraud and that psychiatric
diagnosis is a form of governmentally sanctioned character assassination,
designed to psychologically demean, silence and disenfranchise intelligent,
outspoken people for political reasons. Psychiatry in America, he further
charges, is used for the same purpose it was used in Stalinist Russia and in
nazi Germany and fascist Italy during World War II – as a weapon.
It is also the patient’s belief that
cancer treatment methods currently employed are far more harmful than
beneficial to cancer patients and that patients are being deceived by a wide
network of corporate medicine fraud.
Furthermore, the patient is also very
outspoken about the fact that psychiatric drugs are of no benefit whatsoever to
patients – that such drugs actually impair a patient’s ability to defend
himself – both verbally and physically – reducing the patient to a zombie of
sorts.
Psychiatric patients are typically
treated as mere biochemical objects by physicians and nurses, rather than as
normal people with normal feelings. They are, in effect, mistreated. Both
cancer and mental depression are believed by many to be triggered by the
ongoing cruelty and neglect of significant others, to include family members,
neighbors, employers and health care professionals. Kindness in itself is
theorized to be more beneficial in restoring health and feelings of well being than
any prescribed psychiatric drug.
When the patient arrived back at his home
and carefully apprised himself of on-line literature regarding the newly
marketed not-for-sale Latuda samples (a three-week’s supply) that Frost
handed to him and urged him to take, he made a very well informed decision to
NOT take the drug. He then very appropriately cancelled the appointment Frost
made for him to visit her in three weeks. He also apprised Dr. Martel of his
very intelligent choice to not take the drug and why, although Dr. Martel
contradicted him by attempting to convince him that such drugs are safe and
beneficial.
It is the patient’s very logical belief
that Dr. Martel and her colleagues in oncology are attempting to protect
themselves from a possible malpractice lawsuit by preparing a phony psychiatric
evaluation in order question the patient’s soundness of mind and to, via
neuroleptic chemicals, thus impair the patient’s ability to defend himself.
The patient had already questioned the
treatment methods that were recommended to him by Dr. Stephen Battaglia, a head
and neck specialist, as well as a surgeon, and by other medical practitioners
affiliated with Huntington Medical Center in Pasadena.
It is also the patient’s impression,
based on Dr. Martel’s attitude and her inappropriate remarks to him, that she
was given inaccurate and false information regarding the patient’s medical
history by nurses, x-ray technicians and physicians affiliated with the
Huntington Imaging Center, who referred the patient to Martel.
The bottom line, according to the
patient, is that Melissa Frost is not qualified to be making a psychiatric
evaluation and prescribing any drug, as she is not a licensed medical doctor.
However, by incorporating herself she is attempting to protect herself and her
colleagues from liability.
Latuda was approved by the FDA for treatment of so-called
schizophrenia in October of 2010, although it has not yet been approved for
treatment of so-called bipolar disorder.
The FDA has specifically warned physicians that Latuda
should not be prescribed to elderly patients under any circumstances, as it can
put the patient at risk for a stroke.
As a result of very limited trial study testing on volunteer
human guinea pigs – diagnosed mental patients – all of whom volunteered in
exchange for financial compensation as a result of their economic
impoverishment, there has been no conclusive evidence that Latuda is safe for
anyone. Many volunteers reportedly quit taking the drug and prematurely dropped
out of the testing program.
The experts claim such treatment methods
are highly risky and commonly cause additional pathology – thus merely
prolonging a cancer patient’s suffering up until death.
The patient admittedly experienced an
extreme sensitivity to anesthesia used during surgical procedures he underwent
during his early childhood. Drugs used as anesthesia during surgery are
known to produce post-operative delirium of a paranoid nature in some patients
administered such drugs by physicians. During his early childhood the
patient had such a reaction to ether, which was used during a tonsillectomy he
under went at the age of four and during another minor surgical procedure he
underwent when he was eight years old.
In any event, according to leading
neuroscientists, no one should be prescribed psychiatric drugs of any
kind, as the drugs do not improve brain functioning, but severely damage the
neural networking of the brain and other organs of the body and put a patient
at increased risk for various forms of cancer and heart disease..
The patient was hospitalized and
examined by a team of U. S. government neurosurgeons and psychiatrists over 50
years ago, during the years of 1959 and 1960, as a result of his having been
victimized by ongoing aberrant psychological conditioning by Marine Corps drill
instructors and by Coast Guard officers, training instructors, petty officers
and shipmates, as well as by civilians, while serving his country between the
ages of 17 and 21.
He was then diagnosed as having
experienced a normal adult situation reaction to the inappropriate behavior of
significant others.
However, the mere stigma of a
psychiatric diagnosis, according to the patient, made it increasingly difficult
for him to formulate close relationships and to obtain and sustain employment
following his discharge from the Coast Guard in 1960 at the age of 21. His
psychiatric records, going back over 50 years, which he eventually was able to
obtain through the freedom of information act in 2001, he affirms were and are
gross distortions of truth.
The patient claims the U.S. federal
government owes him millions of dollars in retroactive compensation for
permanently stigmatizing him with an inappropriate psychiatric diagnosis. He
was an ongoing victim of governmentally sanctioned aberrant psychological
conditioning while serving his country as a teenager. He reports he has been
subjected to additional aberrant psychological conditioning by VA and civilian
psychiatrists. He claims he has also been victimized by governmental cover-ups
The 73-year-old patient claims the
United States Coast Guard and the Department of Defense have used psychiatry to
undermine his credibility in order to protect the Department of Defense and the
Coast Guard from the embarrassing truth – that Coast Guard officers-in-charge
hosted an on-ship beer bust while the ship to which he was assigned was
anchored off-shore in the South Pacific. Furthermore, he became a victim of
assault and aggravated battery by an intoxicated shipmate while he was napping
in a hammock on the fantail of the ship following the party. The patient was
then 19 years old. He was also an ongoing victim of demoralizing sexual
harassment by homosexual shipmates, including his supervisors while serving in
the Pacific and in the Gulf of Mexico up until his medical discharge in 1960.
“It was my assailants that were
mentally unbalanced, to include the Marine Corps and Coast Guard officers in
charge, not I,” says the patient.
According to the 73-year-old patient,
who has served on the advisory board of Los Angeles County mental health
agencies, psychiatry is a fraud. A psychiatric diagnosis typically is a
legalized form of character assassination, which can destroy a relatively
normal individual’s chance of ever again being treated as a first class
citizen. Psychiatric treatment is more harmful than helpful. Psychotherapy is
demeaning to the patient and psychiatric drug treatment is more of a nemesis
than an aid.
Furthermore, states the patient, those
who prescribe neuroleptics (so-called anti-psychotic drugs) and antidepressants
are a danger to their patients, as the drugs only further disable the patient,
The drugs damage the neural networking of the brain and place a patient at risk
for a variety of forms of cancer and heart disease.
The patient has previously filed official
complaints and damage claims against other Los Angeles County health care
professionals for a variety of human rights violations, including the crimes of
assault and battery and gross medical malpractice.
In 1994, his attorney filed a damage
claim against the Los Angeles Community College District and community college
administrators and a female psychology department chair for a variety of human
rights violations committed against him, as well as against other students,
while he was an adult student in the human services counseling program.
According to the patient, Dr. Cynthia
Martel violated him by asking him what he felt to be extremely demeaning,
inappropriate and invasive questions,, then impatiently interrupted him – cut
him off – as he was attempting to offer a thorough and appropriate
explanation. Martel only saw the
patient for about ten minutes.
According to the 73-year-old patient,
Melissa Frost also violated him in a very similar manner by asking him highly
inappropriate and inflammatory questions, and by failing to appropriately
respond to his own very appropriate questions regarding the drug she was
prescribing. Frost also only saw the
patient for about ten minutes, hardly enough time to make an accurate
evaluation.
Frost also failed to apprise the man of
his rights as a patient, although she asked him to sign his name to a blank
form, claiming he had been apprised.
The patient has repeatedly affirmed to
everyone that he is allergic to all psychotropic drugs. In fact, his VA medical
records very clearly state that he is ultra sensitive to all chemicals and
caution physicians and nurses to not continue to prescribe neuroleptic drugs or
antidepressant drugs to the patient.
The bottom line, according to the
73-old-patient, is that Melissa Frost, a nurse, technically is not authorized
or licensed to independently evaluate and prescribe any psychiatric drug,
although she authoritatively prescribed Latuda, then handed the patient a
three- week’s supply of not-for-sale Latuda, since she is not licensed
to write a prescription, and made an appointment to see him again in three
weeks, although he cancelled the appointment prior to the scheduled date. Frost
nevertheless billed Medicare for an alleged “psychiatric diagnostic interview”
for which, according to records, Medicare has already paid Frost $126.78.
The 73-year-old patient has a bachelor’s
degree and completed several additional years of undergraduate and graduate
study in psychology, sociology, architecture, regional and city planning, law,
criminal justice planning, police administration and alcohol and drug
counseling. He completed an internship in psychiatric counseling many years ago
and worked as a case manager for a Los Angeles mental health agency.
The patient has served as a member of the
advisory board of Los Angeles County mental health agencies.
The patient has, throughout the years,
published approximately twenty of his own books, all of them listed with
Library of Congress and/or Bowker’s Books in Print, on a variety of subjects,
the first published and released when he was 32 years of age.
The patient’s former wife retired
several years ago as head librarian of the UCSD Medical School Library at San
Diego. One of his cousins holds a juris doctorate degree in law and is chief
counsel and advisor to a number of American health care corporations.
During his youth, the patient was a
competitive swimmer. He served in the United States Coast Guard in the South
Pacific. He later served as a consultant to a law enforcement assistance
council.
During his young adult years the patient
was a volunteer counselor for the Kiwanis Club’s “Operation Amigo” program in
San Diego County.
During his high school days, he was
appointed president of an inter-racial, interfaith youth organization and he
served as president of the Young Peoples Service League of the Episcopal
Church.
As a result of his demonstrated leadership
skills, he was nominated by his high school teachers and by the Rotary Club to
be a delegate to Missouri Boys State at the age of 16, when he passed a
Missouri Bar Exam, scoring 98% correct answers out of a possible 100.
The 73-year-old patient was diagnosed
with cancer by Dr. Stephen Battaglia, a Pasadena surgeon, specializing in head
and neck infections and affiliated with Huntington Memorial Hospital on October
23, 2011. At the time, Dr. Battaglia performed an in-office biopsy on the
patient by taking a sample of tissue from the lymph tissue in his neck. The
biopsy, according to a lab analysis performed the same day, revealed the
presence of some malignant cells.
Prior to performing the biopsy,
according to the patient, Battaglia rather dogmatically informed the patient
that he believed he was suffering from tongue cancer, in order to justify
performing a biopsy of the lymph tissue in his neck, although it is the
patient’s belief, on further examination, that he does not have tongue cancer.
It is the patient’s belief that he has
a localized form of lymphoma or cancer of the neck, which possibly
could be cured or could have been cured had the oncology team been more
attentive and responsive to the patient’s concerns from the onset.
The patient was highly distressed because
of the caustic manner in which he was treated by Dr. Battaglia’s staff members, including the receptionist, on his
first visit to Battaglia’s office.
Although Dr. Battaglia thus referred the
patient to the Huntington Imaging Center for a CT PET SCAN, after learning of
the high degree of radiation exposure he would be subjected to while undergoing
the 30-minute scan, he expressed to the radiation technician, a young man named
Joe, and to others at the Center that he was having second thoughts about
undergoing the scan due to his awareness that radiation can actually cause or
accelerate malignancies.
Nevertheless, Joe, the technician,
injected the 73-year-old patient in the arm with a drug of some sort while the
patient was attempting to explain to him his medical history. Because the
patient expressed to Joe and another male technician, an Asian-American
gentleman, his decision to definitely not undergo the scan and his reason,
primarily claustrophobia, Joe repeatedly mocked and humiliated the
patient, muttering a lot of nonsense under his breath, and afterwards
apparently misrepresented facts to Mays Chua, RN, the clinical nurse
coordinator for Huntington Imaging Center, who in turn apparently
misrepresented the facts to Dr. Martel.
For one thing, the so-called protective
facemask shield Joe attempted to place over his head did not fit over his nose
properly – crushing his nose – and the pressure of the mask when taped down
against the right side of his head was excruciatingly painful. Thus, the
patient decided against going through the PET scan, as well as pursuing any
further radiation treatments.
Had Joe or other members of the
oncology team suggested a sedative, such as Xanax, in lieu of an antipsychotic,
in order to reduce the patient’s anxiety while undergoing the CT PET SCAN, the
patient might have been able to tolerate the 30-minute scan.
The patient did explain to Joe that he
had an allergic reaction to the ether that was
used as an anesthesia during a minor surgical procedure, an orchiopexy, he underwent at the age of eight, the
reaction being frightening post-operative paranoid delirium. However, Joe then
proceeded to mock him – to make light of him – with extremely inappropriate
comments under his breath, as if he didn’t believe that anyone could have such
a reaction to ether.
The problem was not the attitude of the
patient, but the impatient and overly flippant and demeaning attitude of the
radiation technician, Joe, and of other members of the oncology team towards
the patient.
It is the patient’s belief that the
biopsy procedure performed by Dr. Battaglia in October, as well as the
anesthesia Dr. Battaglia injected him with prior to performing the biopsy, and
the drug that Joe, the radiation technician, injected into his arm, via a
hypodermic needle, at the Imaging Center may have aggravated whatever infection
or pathology might have already been present, thus hastening and worsening his
condition. He was also exposed to radiation while two other technicians were
molding the facemask prior to the scheduled CT PET SCAN.
The patient was referred to Dr. Battaglia
by Dr. Stephen Velloze, a Pasadena internist. as a result of the patient’s own
request to be examined by an ear specialist. The patient was concerned about
sudden swelling in his neck beneath his right ear, as well as intermittent earaches.
The patient had experienced several weeks of acute tintinitus in his right ear
a year prior to his visit to Dr. Battaglia.
When the patient experienced a painful
ear infection in early 1994, a physician at the House Ear Clinic in Los Angeles
vacuumed his ear, then prescribed an antibiotic in pill form, which stopped the
infection within 24 hours. Thus, the
patient was in hopes that his current infection could have been treated in a
similar manner.
The patient’s eardrums were punctured by
attending physicians when he was an infant as a result of an inner ear
infection accompanied by a high fever, and resultantly has had recurring
earaches and infections throughout his life.
In
a nutshell, so-called antipsychotic drugs do not prevent psychotic behavior,
they induce and exacerbate psychotic behavior, according to leading
neuroscientists.
So-called
atypical antipsychotic drugs do NOT enhance concentration, according to leading
neuroscientist Eliot Valenstein, author of Blaming the Brain: The Truth
About Drugs and Mental Health and others.. They inhibit one’s ability
to concentrate and put a patient at risk for a variety of fatal malignancies.
They reduce the patient’s capacity for clear thinking, thus turning the patient
into a confused, compliant robot of sorts, unable to defend himself. They, in
effect, merely produce a biochemical lobotomy of sorts.
So-called
antipsychotic drugs also tend to cause weight gain and breast enlargement
in males and females. They put a female patient at risk for giving birth to a
child with a variety of birth defects and they severely damage a patient's
urinary and reproductive organs. Such drugs also tend to cause blurred vision
and akathesia,
inner restlessness and tremors, and thus exacerbate hypomanic or manic behavior
– the very behavioral symptoms they are supposed to prevent.
Learn
more about the potentially destructive side effects of antipsychotic
medications.
The
73-year-old patient has good reason to believe that his present condition was
in part caused by a combination of neuroleptic drugs and antidepressant drugs
he was inappropriately prescribed off and on for a number of years – drugs that
significantly jeopardized his immune system and negatively affected his blood
pressure, his heart rate, his motor skills, his vision and his sinuses.
The
patient has never voluntarily used recreational drugs of any kind, although Dr.
Martel muttered, under her breath, while interviewing him, “they say you’re
on drugs.”
“Who
are they? Martel’s offhanded remark was a cheap shot.
I wasn’t on any drugs, prescription or otherwise. I regularly take vitamins and
mineral supplements, consume predominantly vegetarian (antioxidant) foods, and
exercise daily – jogging outdoors in
the early morning hours. Prior to being diagnosed, I was taking diphenhydramine
hydrochloride (Benadryl) for relaxation purposes. I voluntarily discontinued
taking the diphenhydramine several days prior to the scheduled CT PET SCAN, so
at that time I had no drugs in my system.
“I
have always suffered from a mild degree of claustrophobia,” says the patient, “
which I indeed was experiencing at the time of the scheduled CT PET SCAN. Had
the imaging center ‘team’ been more attentive and patient and had they
prescribed and administered a sedative to me, such as Xanax, prior to
undergoing the PT PET SCAN, I might have been able to tolerate the 30-minute
scan, providing the face mask had been more properly fitted and secured so as
not to crush my nose and cause excruciating pain to the right side of my neck –
as it was pressing against the swollen lymph mass.
“The
only drugs I had been exposed to since visiting Dr. Battaglia in October 2011
were the anesthesia Dr. Battaglia injected me with at the time he performed a
biopsy and the chemical (whatever it was) that Joe, the radiation technician,
injected into in my right arm, while I was at the Huntington Imaging Center,”
states the patient.
The
patient voluntarily discontinued taking all prescribed psychiatric drugs eight
years ago – following a near-fatal overdose of a combination of drugs, to
include Xanax and Depacote, prescribed by Dr. Edward A. Elliott, affiliated
with the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and the West Los Angeles Veterans
Hospital. Since then, he has only
occasionally taken benadryl for relaxation or acetaminophen pm to relieve any physical
pain.
In
April 2003, the patient was hospitalized at Huntington Memorial Hospital in
Pasadena as a direct result of his reaction to a combination of drugs
prescribed by Dr. Elliott and other physicians connected with the West Los
Angeles Veterans Hospital outpatient clinic, when he developed a near-fatal
streptococcus infection, resulting in multiple skin infections and
permanent and severe nerve damage, to
include tremors.
Ironically,
while he was hospitalized, attending psychiatrists, to include Dr. Todd Hutton,
continued to prescribe a combination of the psychotropic drugs, with the
addition of Zyprexa, which merely exacerbated the infection, as well as the
patient’s confusion, resulting in permanent scaring and nerve damage.
The
combination of psychotropic drugs administered by Huntington Memorial Hospital
nurses actually triggered a severe in-hospital acute psychosis, lasting about
24 hours, that did not exist at the time the patient was admitted to the
hospital.
The
patient claims he was subjected to ongoing mental and physical cruelty by
physicians and nurses and other attendants affiliated with Huntington Memorial
Hospital.
Following his discharge from Huntington Memorial Hospital, Dr.
Hutton failed to return the patient’s phone calls for a follow-up outpatient
appointment to discuss his reaction to the drugs prescribed by Dr. Hutton.
As
a result of the inhumane way the patient was treated by physicians, nurses and
other attendants at Huntington Memorial Hospital, the patient has understandably
been extremely cautious about seeking further treatment with physicians, nurses
and other attendants affiliated with Huntington or any other hospital.
In
early 2004, the patient, who was suffering from unbearable migraine headaches
as a result of his reaction to another drug, Trileptal, prescribed by Dr.
Edward A. Elliott, discontinued taking any medication for so-called ‘brain
stabilization’ purposes. It was and
still is his opinion that Dr. Elliott was intentionally trying to harm him.
It
is also the patient’s opinion, based on documented evidence, that many of those
working in the so-called health care professions are criminal psychopaths, who
take advantage of patients that are at a mental and physical disadvantage – who
are unable to defend themselves.
The
patient claims he has, over the years, been subjected to extreme mental and
physical cruelty and negligence by psychiatrists, social workers and nurses,
both male and female, that he has come into contact with since he was a
teenager serving in the Armed Forces, when he was first hospitalized for
observation as a result of his having been repeatedly victimized by the
antisocial acts of his Coast Guard shipmates and the officers in charge, as
well as by civilians.
During
his teen and young adult years, the patient was a victim of extreme verbal
humiliation, character assassination, and assault and aggravated battery to the
head by aggressive males and females, including total strangers. One of his assailants was the teenage son of
a prominent surgeon, who was also a neighbor.
“Any
time I would attempt to report or document such abusive violence, I would be
further humiliated and demeaned by physicians, surgeons, nurses and social workers
that were supposed to be helping me, which has over the years only compounded
my distress and mistrust of so-called ‘health care’ workers,“ says the
73-year-old patient.
The
patient claims all examining physicians and therapists were negligent in the
manner in which they diagnosed and treated his complaints.
Psychiatry
is a fraud, states the patient. Psychiatric medicine, as it is currently
practiced, should be outlawed. A psychiatric diagnosis is all too typically
used as a devious method of discrediting a perfectly normal individual. It is a
form of governmentally sanctioned character assassination, which can
permanently destroy the credibility of anyone so labeled and thus diminish his
chances for ever again being treated as a first class citizen, according to the
73-year-old male cancer patient.
A
psychiatric diagnosis is a virtual death sentence, according to leading critics
of psychiatry. One of the most vehement critics of modern-day psychiatry is
Thomas Szasz, M. D., a long-time professor of psychiatry at New York University
in Syracuse and the author of Cruel Compassion: Psychiatric Control of
Society’s Unwanted and The Myth of Psychotherapy.
Antipsychotic
drugs, to include the newer atypical antipsychotic
drugs, are also known to provoke seizures and cause cognitive impairment and
psychotic thinking, rather than reduce psychotic thinking.
Rather
than tranquilizing the patient, antipsychotic drugs cause ongoing restlessness
and can increase the chances for suicide, for manic behavior and for a variety
of forms of malignancies.
All
atypical antipsychotic drugs have the potential for significantly reducing a
patient’s white blood cell count, a condition characterized as agranulocytosis,
thus increasing one’s vulnerability to
cancer.
Dr.
Cynthia Martel is hereby charged with negligence in recommending a cancer
patient be treated with potentially malignant antipsychotic drugs, while
undergoing radiation and chemotherapy. Nurse Melissa Frost is charged with
aiding and abetting in her failure to apprise the patient of the potentially
dangerous side effects of Latuda, an atypical antipsychotic drug, at the time
she prescribed the drug to the 73-year-old male cancer patient at her office in
Glendora in November of 2011.
Because Melissa Frost is
not authorized to write a prescription for any drug, she is accused of
circumventing the law by providing a three-week’s supply of the newly marketed
Latuda –samples provided Frost by the manufacturer of Latuda and with failing
to warn the patient of the potentially damaging side effects of the drug at the
time she prescribed the drug.
According to the
73-year-old male patient, Melissa Frost was criminally negligent in her failure
to appropriately respond to his questions regarding the drug she was
recommending – Latuda – and the very valid reasons he was reluctant to take any
mood-altering drug. Frost, he claimed, told him not to talk while he was alone
with her in the privacy of her office, claiming that by talking he was
disturbing other patients although there were no other patients in her office.
Prior
to entering Frost’s office, the patient was conversing with another patient –
an adult female patient – and her mother, in the reception room, regarding the
dangerous side effects of prescribed neuroleptic drugs and the fact that
physicians commonly fail to warn their patients in advance that such side
effects – to include akathesia – are often irreversible. In fact, the female
patient had very noticeable signs tardive dyskenisia and expressed the fact
that she was angry because those prescribing the neuroleptic (antipsychotic)
drugs did not warn her in advance.
“The
reason Melissa Frost and others don’t want me to talk, is because I am well informed
on the subject of psychiatric fraud and they don’t want others to know the
truth about the inherent dangers of psychiatric medicine,” says the patient.
“It
is my opinion,” says the patient, “that many, many nurses, physicians and social
workers working in the health care system are severely mentally disturbed
psychopaths, who displace the repressed psychotic anger they harbor for her own
parents onto their already disabled patients. Typically, if a patient complains
about the abuse, he becomes a victim of even more abusive behavior by the
so-called ‘health care’ workers. Cover-ups are commonplace in the health care
system.”
Although the patient did
not take the Latuda samples provided him and explained to Dr. Martel, the
following day, why he chose not to take the Latuda, Dr. Martel arrogantly
contradicted him, falsely claiming such drugs are entirely safe, even when he
explained to her the documented facts – that such drugs are not at all safe and
can further weaken a patient’s immune system.
Dr. Cynthia Martel, USC
oncologist, is hereby charged with misrepresenting facts, with demeaning,
humiliating, slandering and endangering the welfare of a cancer patient.
Glendora nurse Melissa Frost is also charged with misrepresenting facts, with
demeaning, humiliating, slandering and endangering the welfare of a cancer
patient. Both are charged with failure to carefully listen to and appropriately
address the patient’s concerns.
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death – a DVD
Available at Amazon.com
Dr. Cynthia Martel ~ USC oncologist ~ assistant professor ~
cancer treatment ~ South Pasadena ~ California ~ Nurse Melissa L. Frost ~
Glendora
California ~
Dr. Stephen Battaglia ~ head & neck surgeon ~ Battaglia ~ Battaglia Cynthia Martel _ USC oncologist ~ USC Norris
Cancer Center
Melissa Frost,
RN, Corporation, psychiatric nurse practitioner ~ charged with psychiatric
fraud and patient endangerment